Priestly ordinations under condition are INCOMPLETE:
Recently it has been noted that both the new FSSPX and the “Indulted” Congregations (Ecclesia Dei, Fraternity of Saint Peter, IBP) reject the imperative need for Ordination under the condition of modernist “priests” who want to celebrate the Tridentine Mass or those that have been ordained by modernist bishops . Recently a brief has been published on the well-known [and denied by tradiliberals] strong suspicion of invalidity of the new rite of Episcopal Ordination. But more shameful, having noticed that at least in the priestly ordination under condition carried out by Monsignor Williamson to Father Armando Beltran in 2016 has been incomplete. Under the pretext of adhering to the essential rite that confers validity, he has set aside the full prescriptions set by the Roman Pontifical. He has only laid hands and prayed the Preface. [Note: In the case of ordination under condition given to Father Benzi, the same could have happened. We should ask Father Cardozo what he observed].
His Holiness Pius XII in his Apostolic Constitution Sacramentum Ordinis, specifies: Tandem quae supra of matter and form declaravimus ac statuimus, nequaquam ita intelligere fas sit ut vel paulum negligere vel praetermittere liceat ceteros «Pontificalis Romani» ritus constitut; quin immo iubemus ut omnia data praescripta ipsius «Pontificalis Romani» sancte serventur et perficiantur. With respect to what we have previously stated and established with respect to the matter and form, in no other way should it be understood, but that they are not allowed to have negligence in omitting, even in the smallest detail the rest of the Ceremony "as in the Roman Pontifical" is prescribed. On the contrary, we order that all the prescriptions established "by the Roman Pontifical» be followed and observed religiously.
It is an obligation for us as faithful to denounce abuses in this matter, since it is a public act that affects the faithful and the prescriptions of the Church. In this case, the complaint is for the English prelate, Monsignor Williamson, on priestly ordinations under incomplete conditions, without respecting the Roman Pontifical. It seems that the message between the lines was: it is not so necessary to ensure that such priests really are priests, or perhaps what matters is only to do their own will against the very Precepts of the Church. In Session XXIII of the Council of Trent (July 15, 1563, 1775 Dz 965 Can. 5) he says: ¨If anyone says that the sacred anointing that the Church uses
"If anyone says that the sacred anointing that the Church uses in ordination, is not only not required, but that it is despicable and pernicious, and also the other ceremonies, let him be Anatema."
It should be known that in the Code of Canon Law 1917 there is a valid Ecclesiastical sanction (Canon 1002) against those who mutilate the precepted rites of the Roman Pontifical. (Note: The 1982 Code cannot be accepted as Catholic legislation since it is flawed and plagued by modernist errors and its anti-Church spirit). Canon 1002 (CIC1917) reads as follows: “In the collation of any order, the Minister must observe exactly the proper rites prescribed in the Roman Pontifical, or in other ritual books approved by the Church, rites that for no reason are lawful to omit or alter. ” The ecclesiastical penalty or sanction is 2378, and reads as follows: “The senior clergy who, during the sacred ministry of the rites and ceremonies prescribed by the Church, are severely negligent and after being admonished are not amended, must be suspended in accordance to the seriousness of what has been done. " It is likely that the English prelate ignores these remarks, after all the modernists, who now usurp ecclesiastical authority, would applaud his actions. However, Catholics must know that they blindly follow and defend it, how Monsignor Williamson is trampling ecclesiastical laws. Your procedure is not justified in any way. The omission made is quite a serious crime. God help him and we want him and we ask him to withdraw, to obey and respect the Holy Sacraments and laws of the Church and proceed to complete the severely incomplete conditional ordinations that he has made, which must be considered illicit, and insufficient to exercise the priesthood .
It should be mentioned that within the various errors on moral matters decreed by the Holy Office during the papacy of Innocent XI is the following (Dz 1151): It is not lawful to follow in the administration of sacraments the probable opinion on the value of the sacrament, leaving aside the safest opinion, unless it is told by law, convention or the danger of serious harm. Hence, it should not be used the probable opinion in the administration of baptism, of the priestly order or of the episcopate. Regarding the omission of the complete rite of priestly ordination, Bishop Williamson among other important things omits the anointing of the hands. In the traditional rite of Catholic ordination, the bishop anoints the hands of the new priests emphasizing the thumbs and index fingers, which will touch the sacred host. As he anoints each priest, he says: "Tell us, Lord, to consecrate and sanctify these hands with this anointing and our blessing." Then the bishop makes the sign of the cross on the hands of each priest and continues: "All that they bless be blessed, and all that they consecrate be consecrated and sanctified in the name of Our Lord Jesus Christ. ” This prayer has been abolished from the modern ordinal! Why? Well, simply because something so holy is incompatible with the priesthood vision of the conciliar church. The rite of modern ordination only performs the anointing of the palms with a doubtful Holy Crism and without making special mention of the thumbs and index fingers, without reference to the need to be consecrated in order to consecrate. Regarding the flagrant infractions of Mons Williamson to the Code of Canon Law, we already have as scandalous antecedent: the promotion of the reading of the Poem of Valtorta.
For more information read: https://elarietecatolico.blogspot.com/search?q=valtorta
